The November 2013 edition of the NTCL newsletter is published at:
http://eepurl.com/IXv9D
Connecting the Citizens of North Texas with their elected officials
by Natalie Marshall - SALT
Anyone in the ATF who leaks highly sensitive information could be subject to death by firing squad! As reported in the Washington Times, October 15, 2013, the ATF’s on-line manual suggests that “leakers” could be subject to execution by firing squad and even goes so far as to include an old photo of a French firing squad.
At our last meeting, the members of SALT discussed the pro’s and con’s of military intervention in Syria by the US government. Continue reading “SALT’s view on Intervention in Syria”
Do the following statements ring true for you?
Are you satisfied with Texas’ 83rd legislative session? Perhaps a better question would be: Were you aware of Texas’ 83rd legislative session? Did you follow it? Did you participate (contact your legislators, go to Austin in support of or against pieces of legislation) during the legislative session?
Positives during the 83rd legislative session: Continue reading “ARE YOU THINKING ABOUT THE TEXAS 84TH LEGISLATIVE SESSION?”
The August edition of the NTCL Newsletter is published at:
http://us7.campaign-archive2.com/?u=c56921e20edf67898b2d35195&id=cfb4d66dc8
In one year, states will start assessing student learning through computer adaptive tests. But technology issues still pose major hurdles for education in general and Common Core assessments in particular. Continue reading “States Make Progress on Common Core Assessment Prep”
“Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything.”
– Joseph Stalin
Below are arguments against returning to paper ballots.
The indented text is argument in favor of returning to paper ballots.
A.) Public Support / Ignorance
The vast majority of those who do show up and who do vote have confidence in the reporting of electronic voting machines along with confidence in the government and the media that report these vote counts.
ARGUMENT FOR PAPER BALLOTS:
• The general public does not understand how their votes are being counted and stolen via electronic voting machines and the machines that count the bubbled-in paper ballots. (see links at the end of this article)
• The media and those responsible for counting the ballots must expose the evils of counting the votes in secret, through education and support for totally transparent paper ballots.
B.) Outdated, Old Fashioned Methods of Counting the Ballots
Most voters scoff at the idea of abandoning the utilization of advanced technology (refer to item “A.” above.)
ARGUMENT FOR PAPER BALLOTS:
• What are the costs of electronic voting machines to the town, county, and state? How often are upgrades necessary? How much is the cost to warehouse these machines? How secure are the warehouses that store these machines? How secure are the machines overnight at the dozens of early voting locations? The costs of electronic voting machines should be sought, revealed, and compared to the costs of a totally transparent paper ballot counted by local voters at the precinct polling location each evening before Continue reading “Returning to a Totally Transparent Election- arguments “Against” / “For” paper ballots”